MBA
DRAINAGE MEETING
August
12, 2002
Notes
by Joe Reardon
Attendees:
Mike
Henry; DELDOT Maintenance Superintendent for Sussex County
Dave
Wiecking
Dan
Lyons
Carl
Swanson
Lindy
Cohee
Tim
Hill
Joe
Reardon
I. Introduction:
A. The following
Board Policies were discussed.
1. Maintaining
drainage ditches is a MBA not an individual homeowner’s responsibility.
2. MBA budget is
divided into Beach Replenishment, current Operating and Capital Improvement
with drainage solutions being in Capital Improvement.
3. A total
solution to storm water management within Middlesex Beach and handling water
exiting MB is required.
B. Carl Swanson’s
February 9, 2001 report served as the source of the historical record of the
problem.
II. DELDOTs role:
A. Mike Henry
detailed DELDOT’s activities regarding storm water management in and around
Middlesex Beach.
B. He said DELDOT
this fall will clear the ditches along the west side of Route 361 where
Middlesex Beach water drains.
C. A new ditch
will be dug on the East side of Route 361, thus providing 2 routes for the water
to drain from the development.
D. The ditch between
Route 1 and the ocean side of MB along the DELDOT right-of-way will be dug and
cleaned for drainage.
III. Drainage on the west side
of Middlesex Beach:
Two
potential solutions were discussed extensively.
1. Clear the
debris, (trees, shrubs, leaves etc.) from the ditches and provide a uniform slope
towards the West by repositioning virtually all driveway culverts. This
approach would not eliminate completely the standing water after a storm
because of the minimal elevation drop across Middlesex Beach. Bridge Rd, for example, drops about 13”
along its pine side length of about 2000’.
2. Joe Wolf’s
concept of installing covered pipe and catchbasins. This could not be done until after
step 1 is completed.
Approach 2’s
advantages are;
a. Any standing
water would be contained within the pipe, thus reducing the potential health hazard
associated with mosquitoes.
b. Cost savings
because the annual maintaining of the open ditches would not be needed,
although the catch basins would need to be cleaned out occasionally.
The added
installation cost is the disadvantage of this approach. At rough estimated
costs of $500 per catchbasin and $5 per foot of 12” diameter corrugated pipe, it
was estimated it would add $17,500 for each side of each street if the entire
length were done. We have 5 streets wholly within MBA, while Evergreen is
partially shared with South Bethany. This cost would have to be balanced versus
the advantages. The possibility of only doing the back half of each street
was road, as this is where standing water is generally the biggest problem.
The scope of this portion of the problem could be more easily determined after
the ditches are cleaned and the culverts are properly positioned.
IV. Path forward:
Joe
Wolf, Dan Lyons and Carl Swanson are meeting with Engineering firms for the
Long-Range Planning Committee. They will assess the capabilities of these firms
to handle our drainage problem and report back to the Board.
This
topic will be discussed at the Annual meeting to access the community’s
desires.